Andrii Nechyporenko Commented the Legitimacy of Private Detectives’ Acts for TV channel 1+1


Our achievements

  • Advocacy of state enterprise in the International Court of Arbitration (ICC), $ 44 million
  • Legal support of one of the candidates for mayoral position in pre-election campaign 2010.
  • Judicial support of president pre-election campaign 2010 on local levels
  • Reverse of Government Decree Concerning Pension Contribution for Private Entrepreneurs
  • Cars Evacuation is Revoked in Kyiv
  • Case "Karaoke on the Maidan"
  • Case "Koretsky vs. Ukraine"

Andrii Nechyporenko Commented the Legitimacy of Private Detectives’ Acts for TV channel 1+1


12-08-2008

Citizens commend the services of detectives more often in these later days for clarifying some circumstances. One of the reasons why their services are used is mostly suspicions in treason of husband or wife.

“The clients of private searchers or detective agencies have to understand, that court wouldn’t take into consideration facts and materials as evidences because according to the legislation they were cumulated illegally with the violation of right for privacy and flouting the law while making photos or filming video with frequent using of illegal equipment and technologies.

Findings which were cumulated by detective can provide counteraction – the other side in court can counterclaim against detective as well because of illegal intrusion into privacy and flouting the law during making photos and filming video. Divorce in which private detectives are involved can put a lot of troubles and claims for a person who hired the detective.”

These were that things on which pointed out one of the leading attorneys of the Law Firm “Natalia Subota and Partners” in the “Television News Servise” on the TV channel 1+1.




Back to news list